Archive for Arts & Cultural Census

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

Here is one assumption – the more people are educated, then  the more they are interested in arts and culture, and the more  likely they are to buy tickets.  At first glance, that argument seems very reasonable if we only think of it from an arts appreciation perspective.

So, today we will examine how patrons for arts and culture differ by their education level. Look at the below graph.  We see that the largest proportion of arts and culture ticket buyers in the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database are people who have high school degrees. They represent almost half of the buyers, and  people who have college degree or graduate degree are a smaller part of the whole.

However, according to the US Census Bureau 2010 (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04000.html), the proportion of people (age 25+) who have high school degree is 85% in AZ; on the other hand, people who have Bachelor’s degree or higher indicate only 26.3%. If we consider this information, the result lends the credence to the above assumption. Even though people who have Bachelor’s or higher degree represent about one quarter of AZ residents, according to the below graph, they account for over 50% of ticket purchases.

The result supports to an extent, the assumption that arts & cultural participation corresponds to the level of educational achievement. However, in the meantime, it would be narrow and outdated view of arts and culture audience to think that only highly educated people attend arts and cultural events. People with lower educational attainment relatively account for over 80% of AZ residents. If organizations succeed in attracting them, it will make organizations have full of potential to grow.

Further, when organizations do their own analysis, it will be interesting to see how that finding stacks up for different types of events & activities. For example, it will be worthwhile to look at how a museum’s membership compares to audiences for musical theatre, dance or performances for families with children.

It’s time to let go of that old narrow-minded assumption, and we should approach more people to encourage their attendance because people with high school degree are still substantial arts and cultural audiences.

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation. 

———————–

Previously, we learned that, at least here in Arizona, arts and culture is not only for the highly educated people. This week we consider that arts and cultural participation engages audiences far broader than those who primarily identify themselves as fans of arts and culture.

According to the Community Database, people’s lifestyles are classified into eight different categories. For example, high-tech living style, representing almost 19% of Arizona households life style means that the household has at least three of the following interests: Computers, PC Internet/Online Service User, PC Modem Owner, Games-Computer Games, Music-Home Stereo, Movie Collector, Games-Video Games, Photography, TV-HDTV/Satellite Dish; also, cultural living style indicates that household has at least three of the following interests: Arts, Collectibles-Art, Collectibles-Antiques, Theater/Performing Arts (see definitions of other category in the end of the blog for more details).

As indicated below, the pie chart shows very interesting results. Look at the cultural living category. Contrary to this expectation, people who have cultural living life style represent only 1.1% of total arts and culture ticket buyers. Turns out that those people who aspire towards different life styles, not focusing only on arts and culture, show higher proportions of arts and culture ticket buying action. Even people who have the money seeker life style account for 10% of arts and culture ticket buyers in Arizona.

The above results give us much room to develop audiences because it means that regardless of life styles, all people can be viewed as valuable marketing assets. people may have many other reasons to attend arts and culture events; for example, people can attend arts and culture event for socialization, or for spending their free time with family and friends, rather than aesthetic appreciation of arts and culture itself. Arts and culture participation is open to anyone regardless of their life styles. Further, because there are so many reasons people are induced to participate, we should broadly approach more people, and market arts and cultural products.

< Note: Definitions of Life Styles by Community Database>

Broader Living: Household has at least three of the following interests: Travel-International, Current Affairs/Politics, Theater/Performing Arts, Community/Charities, Reading-Audio Books, Reading-Magazines, Reading-Science Fiction, Reading-Religious/Inspirational, Reading

Common Living: Household has at least three of the following interests: Religious/Inspirational, Reading-Religious/Inspirational, Natural Foods, Sweepstakes/Contests, Collectibles-Coins, Collectibles-Stamps, Christian Families, Gardening.

High Brow: Household has at least three of the following interests: Investments-Personal, Investments-Real Estate, Investments-Stock/Bond, Community/Charities, Self Improvement.

Money Seekers: Household has at least three of the following interests: Investments-Personal, Investments-Real Estate, Investments-Stock/Bond.

Professional Living: Household has at least three of the following interests: Career Improvement, Self Improvement, Investments-Personal, Career Interest, Education Online.

 

In a year-end growth spurt, your Arizona Community Database has grown to more than 808,000 unique households statewide – thanks to the new participation of:

  • Ballet Arizona
  • Phoenix Symphony
  • Flagstaff Convention & Visitors Bureau
  • Foundation for Traditional Culture

A quick check of the US Census information reveals that Arizona is home to a total of nearly 2.25 million households – which means that the Community Database now tracks 5 years of arts & cultural participation encompassing 36% of ALL Arizona households! 

And we are not done growing yet.  All Alliance for Audience member organizations are invited to participate – AT NO CHARGE – in the Community Database. 

The next “window of opportunity” is open right now! 

Simply complete & return THIS FORM by January 20 – and be prepared to upload your data no later than February 3.

You’ll find complete information about the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census and Community Database HERE.

Please contact Matt Lehrman at MLehrman@allianceforaudience.com for additional information or assistance. Here again, spelled out, is the link for complete information:  http://www.allianceforaudience.org/Pages/arts&culturecensus.html 

# # #

 

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

Over the last couple of weeks, we examined basic demographic characteristics of arts and culture ticket buyers in Arizona. This week, we take a look at how the patron profile differs by marital status, presence of children and home ownership rate.

Following the graph below, we see that 70% of the arts and culture ticket buyers represented in the Community Database are married people. Why do arts and culture events appear to draw so many more married people than single?

One of the reasons might be the presence of children. Attending arts and culture events near their home is an easy way to spend free time with children. Let’s look at the below graph. However, contrary to this expectation, it shows distinguished results between ticket buyers who have children and those who do not. People who have children represent 42.7%, of those buying arts and cultural event tickets; rather, people who do not have children show higher proportions of ticket buying action (57.3%). So, the presence of children is not the solo reason to influence ticket buying action for married people. It may be valuable to look at other factors such as lifestyle rather than simple presence of children.

Let’s look at ticket buying by home ownership. As indicated below, home owners comprise 98.4% of the households in the Community Database!  Why would that be when, according to the 2010 U.S. Census, the proportion of home ownership of Arizona is 68.3%?  Have we actually just declared 31.7% of Arizona’s population (i.e. non-homeowners) to be NON-arts & cultural attenders?)  

That’s a fascinating and important question – but having checked with TRG Arts to make sure we really are concluding what we THINK we are concluding, let’s just call it too-early in the process for this to be considered a settled fact.

So far, no further data in the Community Database helps us to figure out what aspects impact on the ticket buying action depending on people’s home ownership. However, regardless of the presence of children, married people are clearly attractive arts and culture consumers. It will be worthwhile to investigate further what makes them attend arts and cultural events in Arizona.

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

In the previous blog, we looked at the basic demographic patron profile, age and sex. Today, we examine the household income of arts and cultural patrons in Arizona. Income can directly impact arts and culture patronage, with an expectation that active patrons are more likely drawn from higher income levels. Today, we will examine whether higher income households attend more arts and cultural events in Arizona.

First, let’s look at how the proportion of ticket-buying households varies by income in Arizona, drawing  on the Community Database. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the median household income in Arizona is $48,711.  This means that half of Arizona households make less than $48,711, and half make more.

Now consider the graph below, which shows how ticket sales break across these two (approximately) equally-sized groups.  It indicates that higher income households are a large majority (81.7%) of arts and cultural events attenders.

However, looking now at the income distribution (below table), the result suggests that we must not overlook lower income households.  Clearly, most of the action is in the higher-income categories. Households in the $70,000 to $79,999 annual income range account for 16.9% of ticket buyers.  Households with incomes ranging from $125,000 to $150,000 are the next largest group, accounting for 15.4% of attendance. These two groups alone represent one third of ticket buyers.

However, even though it seems to look like a small proportion when you are looking at the distribution,  nearly one in eight ticket-buying households (11.9%) fall in the annual income range between  $30,000 and $49,999.

Distribution of Ticket-buying Households by Levels of Income

Of course, income is not the only factor that influences ticket buying.  We have to consider other factors as well, such as genre, ticket price, and the disposition of arts and culture consumers. However, even so, I am happy to see that attending arts and cultural events is not just for the rich families. If you have previously overlooked the potential of lower to mid income households as a valuable consumer, it is time to devote attention to them from now on.

It is also important to recognize that this analysis represents an overview of the TOTAL Community Database – which itself is a growing & on-going work in progress.  In addition, organizations that are participating in the Community Database have the independent (and confidential to them) ability to specifically analyze the income profile of their own unique audiences.

 


Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

In the previous blog, we examined geographic characteristics of Arizona’s arts & cultural patrons. Today, we will examine overall demographic characteristics, especially age and gender. Needless to say, understanding the demographics of a region can be an efficient and effective marketing tool to attract audiences.

First, we will take a look at the age distribution of ticket buying households in AZ (as tracked by the nearly 700,000 households represented in the Community Database.)  Not surprisingly, a middle-aged population (the highest rate is range of age 52-53) is the driving force in sales. However, one thing good to observe is the STRENGTH of participation of populations leading UP to the peak at age 52-53.  (Isn’t it it interesting to note that the ”downward slide” of participation by older audiences is steeper than the upward climb of younger populations?)  For example, the range of age 52-53 households accounts for 5.8% by all buyers, while the range of age 34-35 represents 3.0% but is still greater than the power of the population over over age 66.

Now, the below graph is grouped by same generations. Generally, the age 45-64 group (baby boomers born 1946-1964) accounted for 44% of the total.  The next younger population (age 25-44) indicates the next largest buyer proportion (40%) of the total. Does that mean that as generations progress over time that arts & cultural participation stands as a major function of achieving “middle-age”?  The jury is still out on that question – and we will be using the community database to answer that question over time.

Next, let’s consider overall gender difference. The Community Database reports that women show slightly more active attendance to arts and culture event than men. Let’s look at the below graph. Women represent 52.2%, which is about 4% higher than men. Personally, I’m not surprised by this.  Whenever I attend arts and cultural events, there seem to be more women than men in attendance.  But whether this is a quantitative or qualitative difference – as measured by the Community Database – remains to be explored.

However, here are some interesting points. Even though the average attendance of women is higher than men’s, according to the below graph, the actual gap between men and women in the group of under the age 44 is less than 1%. Further, arts and cultural attendance of  the age between 65-74 shows equal proportions (6% each) as well; rather, in the group of age plus 75, men (4.2%) show more frequent buying action rather than women (3.9%). Therefore, focusing simply on women without a consideration of consumer’s age is no more magic formula to boost arts and cultural consumption.

Utilizing the classification of age, it is now possible for arts & cultural organizations to understand important and nuanced facts about their audience – and employ those insights in growing future audiences.  Remember:  every insight that we are writing about here regarding the totality of the Community Database is also easily and freely available to each organization participating in the Community Database to use to confidentially evaluate their own audiences.

# # #

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

In the previous blog, we examined the national characteristics of Arizona’s arts & cultural patrons.  Today, we will examine the Arizona statistics.

So far, the 94 percent of the households in the Arizona Community Database are located in Maricopa County, while 6% of households are from only three other Arizona counties: Coconino, Pinal, and Yavapai. The interesting point here is that all the households’ data of Coconino County are from only Flagstaff, and those of Yavapai County are only from Prescott. On the other hand, the data from Pinal County show a different aspect. Even though main attendances are from Apache Junction, Gold Canyon and Casa Grande also represent a total of over 4,000 households.

Patron by Geography in AZ

[Note: Only mailable households are included; for further information, refer to the Zip Penetration Report in eMerge. (https://emerge.trgarts.com/eMerge1/launch)]

Now, we will take a look at our 94% households specifically. Based on the number of households in Maricopa County by the 2010 U.S Census, the 94% households participating in arts and cultural activities represent  24% of all the households in the county.

What city do you think is home to the most active participation in arts and cultural activities? Look at the below graph. It shows our top three candidates. As you might expect, the top three are Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Mesa.

However, that result may be simply caused by size of the city. So, it is necessary to take a look at their actual proportion of attendance depending on households of each city. Unfortunately, there are no separate households information about Laveen and Paradise Valley based on the 2010 US Census. However, we can still get some interesting results. Look at the below graph. Do you think still that Phoenix is the most culturally activated region? NO! Contrary to expectation, Phoenix shows a relatively low percentage of patron households (17%). Also, Avondale, Glendale, and Surprise appear to have the same situation as well. As you can see below, the top three regions that show the most activated cultural attendance are Cave Creek, Litchfield Park, and Scottsdale. Isn’t it interesting?

Proportion of Patron

First of all, Scottsdale is a real gem; it lives up to our expectation, representing a high percent (48%) of patrons engaging in arts and culture. Also, even though Cave Creek and Litchfield Park have less than 3,000 households, the above graph tells us that it is worthwhile to include them as important arts and culture consumers. It shows their enthusiasm for arts and cultural activities.

If you have previously overlooked their potential as a valuable asset, it is time to devote attention to those cities from now on.

 

Erika Sung is an ASU doctoral student in community resources and development where she focuses on non-profit management.  Her analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database is underwritten by a grant from the Lodestar Foundation.  

———————–

When an organization plans to produce arts & cultural offerings, when & how do you consider the availability of audiences?

While a quality arts or cultural experience is at the heart of every organization’s mission, there is no question but that without the PATRON, there is no experience to be had.  As competition for patrons has (dramatically) increased, it is increasingly important to understand the characteristics of who comprises your organization’s audience.

The US Census (2010) reports that Arizona’s 6.4 million residents occupy nearly 2.9 million households.  At about 700,000 unique households (and growing), the Arizona Community Database tracks arts & cultural participation of nearly 20 percent of ALL Arizona households and reveals fascinating insight into where Arizona’s arts & cultural audiences call home:

Because the Community Database has been most quickly embraced by organizations in the Greater Phoenix area (though it is certainly open to Alliance for Audience members in Tucson, Flagstaff & Prescott!) the data shows a preponderance of audiences members residing in Maricopa County.  (The database tracks nearly 34% of ALL Maricopa County residents!)

It’s fascinating to note that 22% of the database resides outside of Arizona.  All 50 states are represented somewhere in the Arizona community database (which speaks strongly to Arizona’s role as a visitor destination) – and California (not surprisingly) is the state with the largest representation.

Several new organizations from around the state are poised to join the Arizona Community Database in the next several months.  It will be fascinating to measure how measuring arts & cultural participation in Tucson, Flagstaff & Prescott adds to these insights – and, in particular, to assess the extent to which the participation of Maricopa County-based residents powers arts & cultural participation around the state.

 

As the 6th largest city in the United States today, the Phoenix metropolitan area has more than 130 arts and cultural organizations for Phoenix residents and visitors. The range and diversity of organizations and activities is reflective of a rich arts and cultural environment; it includes a symphony orchestra, opera and ballet companies, producing and presenting theater and dance organizations, performing arts centers, art and history museums, botanical garden, and festivals. However, not all of them are big organizations supported by large amounts of funding annually; rather most of them have relatively small annual budget to run their organizations.

As you can see, our 28 art and cultural organizations out of 49 member organizations also run their organizations on less than $500k annually–which is close to 57% of Community Database participants. On the other hand, only 19% of participating organizations have more than 6 million dollars per year.

Note: number of organizations is in the parentheses.

So, what do you think? Do you think relatively small budget organization barely contribute to the Community Database as compared to the big organizations? Below graph shows an interesting result, indicating how important small budget organizations are.

Of course, nine relatively largest budget size organizations cover 64% of households in the Community Database. However, in this graph, the point we have to focus on is not the largest budget size organizations but smallest budget size organizations. Even though their annual budget size is less than $500k, they can cover almost 29% of the households in the Community Database. Their annual budget is only 1/12 of the largest budget size. Yet even though, audiences explained by each organization may be slight, with accumulation from the numbers of organizations, almost 200,000 households are covered by small budget size organizations.

It is easy to overlook the influence of small organizations. However, like an old saying, ‘many a little make a mickle’, if small budget organizations stand together to understand their audiences, they will make a huge contribution to analyzing the whole database. Therefore, small budget size organizations are really important compositions of the Community Database.

The Swedish have a saying that “Shared joy is double joy” – and that’s a great attitude to bring to the analysis of the Arizona Arts & Cultural Census/Community Database as you discover what your audiences do (and don’t) have in common with those of other organizations.  
 
So far, 49 arts & cultural organizations have uploaded their audience & supporter databases into the highly secure and totally confidential repository.  Yet their combined reach already accounts for nearly 700,000 Arizona households – which is close to 25% of ALL Arizona households.
 
It is important to understand the BREADTH of organizations represented in the Community Database – and understand that each organization’s entire database is classified into a Genre.

 

As you can see, various types of arts & culture organizations represented. Here is how they are grouped:  

Genre • Participating Organization(s)

  • Choral/Vocal • Phoenix Boys Choir
  • Orchestra/Instrumental • DuoWest • ProMusica Arizona Chorale & Orchestra • West Valley Symphony Association Inc.
  • Dance • A Ludwig Dance Theatre • Arizona Dance Coalition • AZ Dance Group • Conder/Dance • Desert Dance Theatre • Scorpius Dance Theatre • Southwest Youth Ballet Theatre
  • Theatre • Actors Theatre • Arizona Broadway Theatre • Arizona Theatre Company • Broadway Palm Dinner Theatre- Arizona • Carnival of Illusion • Childsplay, Inc. • Nearly Naked Theatre • New Carpa Theatre • Phoenix Theatre • Prescott Center for the Arts • Southwest Shakespeare Co. • Theatre Artists Studio
  • Performing Arts Center • ASU Gammage • ASU Kerr Cultural Center • Chandler Center for the Arts • City of Prescott/Elks Opera House • Del E. Webb Center for the Performing Arts • Herberger Theater Center • Mesa Arts Center • Scottsdale Center for the Performing Arts
  • Museum • Arizona Museum of Natural History • ASU Art Museum • Children’s Museum of Phoenix • Heard Museum • Phoenix Art Museum • Smoki Museum, Inc. • The Children’s Museum Alliance, Inc.
  • Service/Advocacy • Alliance for Audience • Arizona Citizens/Action for the Arts
  • Film • Phoenix Film Foundation
  • TV/Radio • Friends of Public Radio Arizona – KJZZ & KBAQ • KAET Arizona PBS
  • Education • Phoenix Conservatory of Music
  • Nature • Desert Botanical Garden
  • Other • Jazz in Arizona (Jazz in AZ) • Metropolitan Tucson Convention & Visitors Bureau • Scottsdale Convention & Visitors Bureau • West Valley Arts Council

Such a wide variety of groups are collaborating to build arts and cultural capacity in Arizona! Understanding how “genre” is represented is a basic step to get acquainted with Community Database.

In the coming weeks, we’ll examine the total database from a variety of perspectives. We’ll talk about distribution of organizations by budget size and examine audiences from the perspective of their demographics and also discover fascinating patterns in what they attend – and where – and when.

 ——————–

Have a question about the Community Database that you’d like to ask Erika to explore?  Please submit it to Census@allianceforaudience.org.